Ashcroft vs Lurnea
A data-only, side-by-side comparison of Ashcroft and Lurnea, two suburbs in New South Wales — population, demographics, socio-economic profile and climate, drawn from public sources.
Key differences
- Lurnea is the larger of the two, with about 10,057 residents to Ashcroft's 3,634.
- Lurnea sits a little higher on the ABS SEIFA index of socio-economic advantage (858 to 779, where about 1000 is the national average).
- Median weekly household income is higher in Lurnea ($1,239 to $1,089).
Ashcroft vs Lurnea side by side
| Measure | Ashcroft | Lurnea |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 3,634 | 10,057 |
| Median age | 32 | 32 |
| Median weekly household income | $1,089 | $1,239 |
| SEIFA score | 779 | 858 |
| Local government area | Liverpool | Liverpool |
| State / territory | New South Wales | New South Wales |
| Avg summer high (Jan) | 27.9°C | 27.9°C |
| Avg winter high (Jul) | 17°C | 17°C |
| Annual rainfall | 862 mm | 862 mm |
Climate figures are long-run monthly normals (Open-Meteo, ERA5 reanalysis).
Common questions
Is Ashcroft or Lurnea bigger?
Lurnea is larger, with about 10,057 residents at the 2021 Census compared with 3,634 in Ashcroft.
Is Ashcroft or Lurnea warmer?
Ashcroft is generally warmer in summer, with an average January daytime high of 27.9°C compared with 27.9°C.